GRE Scoring Guide

GRE Scoring: Everything You Need to Know

How GRE scores are calculated, what the percentiles mean, how adaptive scoring determines your ceiling, the full AWA rubric, how ScoreSelect works, and exactly what scores top programs expect — all in one place.

Last updated: 2026 · 18 min read

How GRE Scoring Works — Overview

The GRE General Test produces three separate scores, one for each section. These scores are independent — your Writing score has no effect on your Verbal or Quantitative score, and vice versa. Your total GRE score is the sum of Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning, ranging from 260 to 340. Analytical Writing is reported separately on its own 0–6 scale and is never added to the total.

Verbal Reasoning

130–170

1-point increments

Average~150

Top 10%163+

Quantitative Reasoning

130–170

1-point increments

Average~153

Top 10%167+

Analytical Writing

0–6

0.5-point increments

Average~3.5

Top 10%5.0+

Raw scores (number of correct answers) are converted to scaled scores through a statistical process called equating. Equating adjusts for minor differences in difficulty between test forms and between adaptive sections, so that a score of 160 means the same level of ability regardless of which test date you took or which version of the second section you received.

How Section-Adaptive Scoring Works

The GRE uses section-level adaptivity — a design where your performance on the first section of each measure determines which version of the second section you receive. This is distinct from question-level adaptivity (where each individual question adapts in real time).

The routing mechanism in detail

All test takers begin with a medium-difficulty first section for both Verbal and Quantitative. Your performance on Section 1 is evaluated holistically across all 20 questions — there is no magic "cutoff" question that triggers the routing. Based on that evaluation, you receive a harder or easier second section. This happens independently for Verbal and Quantitative.

The hard second section contains more high-difficulty questions and unlocks access to scaled scores in the 163–170 range. The easy second section contains fewer high-difficulty questions and caps your scaled score at approximately 155–160. The medium second section falls in between.

Why performing well on Section 1 is strategically critical

A test taker who answers 90% of Section 1 questions correctly will receive the hard second section — and if they answer 85% of that hard section correctly, they may score 168. A different test taker who answers 90% of Section 1 correctly but performs worse on the hard Section 2 will score lower — but still higher than if they had received an easy Section 2. The key insight: being routed to the hard section does not guarantee a high score, but being routed to the easy section guarantees you cannot score in the high 160s.

Practical strategy: Do not rush through Section 1 assuming it is "easy." Never skip to the "harder questions later in the section" — GRE sections are not necessarily arranged in difficulty order. Answer every Section 1 question with full attention. The routing happens after all 20 questions are submitted, based on overall performance.

Adaptive Algorithm: Full Mechanics

The GRE's section-adaptive design has specific structural rules that every test taker should understand before sitting the exam. This is not just theory — it directly determines your score ceiling.

Exact structure of the GRE (2023+ format)

Section	Questions	Time	Difficulty	Function
Verbal Section 1	12 questions	18 min	Medium (fixed)	Routes to harder or easier V Section 2
Verbal Section 2	15 questions	23 min	Easy / Medium / Hard	Scores + determines V scaled score range
Quant Section 1	15 questions	21 min	Medium (fixed)	Routes to harder or easier Q Section 2
Quant Section 2	15 questions	26 min	Easy / Medium / Hard	Scores + determines Q scaled score range
Experimental Section	Varies	Varies	Mixed	Not scored — ETS pretests new questions

The experimental section: The GRE contains one unscored experimental section (either Verbal or Quantitative, ~20 minutes) that is used by ETS to pretest new questions. It appears identical to a real section. You will not be told which section is experimental during the test. Treat every section as real — guessing on what you think is the experimental section is a high-risk strategy that has caused significant score damage.

How the routing decision is made

After you complete Verbal Section 1, ETS's scoring engine evaluates your performance on all 12 questions simultaneously. The routing algorithm assigns each question an item difficulty parameter (a value determined during pretesting). Your total "ability estimate" — calculated from which questions you answered correctly and how difficult those questions were — determines which Section 2 pool you are drawn from.

Routed to Hard Section 2

TriggerStrong Section 1 performance — typically answering the majority of medium-to-hard questions correctly

Score range unlockedAccess to scaled scores from approximately 158 to 170

Key implicationEven answering only 60% of the hard Section 2 correctly can yield a high scaled score because the questions carry more ability weight

Routed to Medium Section 2

TriggerAverage Section 1 performance — mixed results on medium-difficulty questions

Score range unlockedAccess to scaled scores from approximately 148 to 162

Key implicationThe ceiling is real: perfect performance on a medium second section still cannot produce a score above ~162

Routed to Easy Section 2

TriggerBelow-average Section 1 performance — missed most medium questions

Score range unlockedAccess to scaled scores from approximately 130 to 152

Key implicationScores in this range are possible regardless of how well you do on the easy section; further performance cannot compensate for the routing

The question-order myth

Many GRE guides claim questions are arranged easy-to-hard within a section. This is not reliably true. ETS explicitly states that questions within a section are not necessarily in difficulty order. Within Text Completion and Reading Comprehension, passage-based questions naturally follow their passages regardless of difficulty. Quantitative Comparison questions may appear early or late regardless of difficulty.

The practical consequence: do not skip questions you find hard "because they must be worth more." All questions within a section are worth exactly 1 raw point regardless of difficulty. Hard questions are harder to get right, but they are not worth more points. The adaptation happens at thesection level, not the question level.

Raw Score to Scaled Score — How the Conversion Works

Raw scores (the count of correct answers across both sections) are converted to scaled scores through a statistical process called equating. Understanding equating helps explain why ETS does not publish a definitive raw-to-scaled conversion table, and why chasing a target raw score count is less reliable than maximizing correct answers.

What equating does

Every GRE administration uses a slightly different set of questions — drawn from a pool of pretested items. Some administrations have slightly harder questions on average; others have slightly easier ones. Equating statistically adjusts for these differences so that a scaled score of 162 reflects the same ability level regardless of whether you took the test in March or October, or received the hard or medium adaptive section.

Equating is also why the raw-to-scaled conversion differs depending on which second section you received. A test taker who answered 30 raw points correctly across a hard Verbal Section 1 and hard Verbal Section 2 will receive a higher scaled score than a test taker who answered 30 raw points correctly across medium sections — because the harder questions carry more ability-inference weight in the equating model.

Approximate raw-to-scaled reference ranges

ETS does not publish an official conversion table. The ranges below are derived from official GRE score guide data and are approximate. Actual conversions on your test date may differ.

Verbal (total raw = 27 questions)

Raw correct	Hard S2 range	Medium S2 range
27 (perfect)	170	160–162
25–26	167–169	158–161
23–24	164–166	155–158
21–22	161–163	152–155
19–20	158–160	149–152
17–18	155–157	146–149
14–16	150–154	142–146
10–13	144–149	138–142
≤9	130–143	130–138

Quantitative (total raw = 30 questions)

Raw correct	Hard S2 range	Medium S2 range
30 (perfect)	170	163–165
28–29	167–169	161–163
26–27	164–166	158–161
24–25	161–163	155–158
22–23	158–160	152–155
20–21	155–157	149–152
17–19	150–154	145–149
13–16	144–149	140–145
≤12	130–143	130–140

Key takeaway: The hard Section 2 is worth it even if you answer fewer questions correctly. A test taker answering 22/27 Verbal questions correctly on the hard Section 2 path (162–163) outscores a test taker answering 25/27 correctly on the medium Section 2 path (158–161). Being routed to the hard section does not mean you need to answer more questions — it means each correct answer is worth more ability-inference weight.

Verbal Reasoning Scoring

Each Verbal section contains 20 questions. You receive 1 point for each correct answer. There is no penalty for wrong answers. You should always provide an answer for every question — guessing is better than leaving questions blank.

Question type scoring details

Text Completion (1 blank): 1 point if the correct word is selected. 5 answer choices; 20% chance if guessing randomly.
Text Completion (2 blanks): 1 point only if BOTH blanks are correct. No partial credit. 1 in 9 chance if guessing randomly (3 × 3).
Text Completion (3 blanks): 1 point only if ALL THREE blanks are correct. 1 in 27 chance if guessing randomly (3 × 3 × 3).
Sentence Equivalence: 1 point only if BOTH correct words are selected. No partial credit. There are exactly two correct answers among 6 choices.
Reading Comprehension (standard MCQ): 1 point for the correct answer. 5 choices.
Reading Comprehension (select all that apply): 1 point only if ALL correct options are selected and NO incorrect options are selected. Partial credit is not awarded.
Reading Comprehension (select-in-passage): 1 point for clicking the correct sentence.

Raw to scaled conversion

Your raw score across both Verbal sections is converted to a scaled score on the 130–170 range. The conversion depends on which version of Section 2 you received (hard, medium, or easy). Because the GRE is equated across test forms, the precise conversion varies between administrations. ETS does not publish a fixed raw-to-scaled conversion table for this reason. Chasing "how many right to get X score" tables is unreliable — focus on maximizing correct answers, not on a target raw count.

Quantitative Reasoning Scoring

Each Quantitative section contains 20 questions. Like Verbal, you receive 1 point per correct answer with no penalty for wrong answers.

Question format scoring details

Quantitative Comparison: 1 point for choosing the correct relationship (A greater, B greater, equal, or cannot be determined). 4 choices; 25% chance if guessing.
Multiple Choice — one answer: 1 point for the correct answer. 5 choices; 20% chance if guessing.
Multiple Choice — one or more answers: 1 point only if ALL correct choices are selected and NO incorrect choices are selected. No partial credit. There may be 1, 2, or 3 correct answers.
Numeric Entry (integer or decimal): 1 point if the entered value is correct. The answer must be exact or rounded/truncated as the problem specifies.
Numeric Entry (fraction): Both numerator and denominator must be correct for 1 point. Fractions do not need to be in lowest terms unless specified.

On-screen calculator

The GRE provides a basic four-function calculator with a square root button and memory function on every Quantitative question. It is not a graphing calculator and cannot solve equations symbolically. Use it for: precise arithmetic in Data Interpretation sets, percentage calculations, and checking exact decimal or fraction values. Avoid using it for every problem — many GRE Quant questions are faster to solve conceptually than numerically, and calculator use takes time.

V+Q Total: How Your Combined Score Is Calculated

Your GRE combined score is the sum of your Verbal Reasoning scaled score and Quantitative Reasoning scaled score. It ranges from 260 (both sections at minimum 130) to 340 (both sections at maximum 170). Analytical Writing is never added to this total.

The 260–340 scale in context

Combined V+Q	Context	Approx. percentile (combined)
330–340	Elite — top programs in any field	98th–99th
320–329	Competitive for top-20 programs	90th–97th
310–319	Strong — competitive for most ranked programs	75th–89th
300–309	Adequate — meets minimums at most programs	50th–74th
290–299	Below average — may limit options at selective programs	25th–49th
280–289	Weak for most graduate programs	10th–24th
260–279	Minimum floor — not competitive without exceptional application	<10th

Worked examples: same total, different profiles

The same V+Q total means very different things depending on the field you are applying to. Two applicants with a combined 320 can have dramatically different competitiveness.

Example A — STEM PhD applicant: V 153 + Q 167 = 320

Verbal

153

Quant

167

AWA

4.0

V+Q Total

320

For a Computer Science PhD, Q 167 is at the 91st percentile — highly competitive. V 153 is at the 55th percentile — adequate for a STEM field. AWA 4.0 meets most minimums. This profile is strong for STEM programs.

Example B — Humanities PhD applicant: V 167 + Q 153 = 320

Verbal

167

Quant

153

AWA

5.0

V+Q Total

320

For an English or History PhD, V 167 is at the 96th percentile — exceptional. Q 153 is at the 49th percentile — average, but largely irrelevant in humanities. AWA 5.0 at the 93rd percentile is a significant strength. This same total 320 is arguably more competitive for this applicant's field.

Example C — MBA applicant: V 160 + Q 160 = 320

Verbal

160

Quant

160

AWA

4.5

V+Q Total

320

For business school, both sections matter and balance is valued. V 160 (86th percentile) and Q 160 (76th percentile) produce a well-rounded profile. AWA 4.5 (80th percentile) is strong. This is a competitive profile for top-25 MBA programs.

Example D — Missing a target by 1 point: V 160 + Q 159 = 319

Verbal

160

Quant

159

AWA

4.0

V+Q Total

319

If a program requires 320 combined, this applicant falls 1 point short. However, V and Q scores are reported separately — if the program considers the sections individually rather than the combined total, this applicant may still be competitive. Always check whether the program specifies a combined minimum or section-specific minimums.

Section score vs combined score: what programs report

When you send a GRE score report, programs see all three section scores (Verbal, Quantitative, Analytical Writing) individually — not a combined score. The 260–340 combined total is a useful summary but is not what appears on your official score report. Admissions committees evaluate section scores in the context of what matters for their program.

This means: even if a program lists "minimum 310 combined," they will notice if your 310 comes from V 140 + Q 170 or from V 155 + Q 155. The distribution matters for field-relevant assessment.

Percentile interpretation: why Quant percentiles are harder to boost

The GRE test-taking population globally is skewed toward STEM candidates, many of whom come from countries with rigorous math education systems. This creates a compressed Quant percentile distribution at the top: a score of 168 is only at the 94th percentile (6 in 100 people scored this high), while a score of 170 (perfect) is at the 97th percentile. The top 3% of the distribution spans only 2 score points. For Verbal, the distribution is wider: 168 is at the 98th percentile, with more score points separating each percentile tier.

Practical implication: For STEM applicants, a Q score of 163–167 is highly competitive and attempting to push from 166 to 170 yields only marginally improved percentile ranking. That retake preparation time may be better spent on the Verbal section, where a score improvement from 152 to 158 represents a gain of nearly 30 percentile points.

Analytical Writing Scoring — Process

The Analyze an Issue essay is scored holistically on a 6-point scale in half-point increments (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0). Most test takers score between 3.0 and 4.5.

Scoring process: human + AI

Each essay is scored by one trained human rater and one automated scoring engine (e-rater, developed by ETS). If the human score and the e-rater score agree within 1 point, the average of the two scores is the final reported score. If they differ by more than 1 point, a second human rater evaluates the essay, and the two human scores are averaged.

E-rater analyzes: sentence length variety, use of vocabulary sophistication, grammatical accuracy and complexity, essay length, use of topic-relevant vocabulary, discourse structure (paragraph breaks, transitions), and internal coherence. It does not assess the logical validity of the argument — that is the human rater's job. This dual-scoring system is highly reliable and catches both strong and weak essays consistently.

What the human rater evaluates

The human rater evaluates the essay holistically across three dimensions simultaneously:

Quality of ideas and argument development: Is the position clear, defensible, and well-reasoned? Are the examples specific and relevant? Does the essay engage with complexity?
Organization and coherence: Does the essay have a clear structure? Are transitions effective? Does each paragraph advance the argument?
Language command: Is the vocabulary precise and varied? Are sentence structures varied? Are errors minimal and non-distracting?

AWA Full Scoring Rubric (0–6)

The following are ETS's official score level descriptors for the Analyze an Issue task, with expanded detail to help you understand what distinguishes each score level.

6Outstanding

·Presents a cogent, well-articulated analysis of the issue and conveys meaning skillfully
·Develops a position with compelling reasons and persuasive examples — specific, not generic
·Sustains a well-focused, well-organized analysis, connecting ideas logically
·Expresses ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety
·Demonstrates superior facility with the conventions of standard written English, with virtually no errors
·Considers complexity and counterarguments with genuine depth, not superficially
·Typical length: 500–650 words

5Strong

·Presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed analysis of the issue
·Develops a position with relevant reasons and examples that are mostly specific
·Is focused and generally well-organized
·Expresses ideas clearly and with appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety
·Demonstrates strong facility with writing conventions, with minor errors that do not impede clarity
·Considers the complexity of the issue; may have minor lapses in depth or nuance
·Typical length: 450–600 words

4Adequate

·Presents a competent analysis of the issue
·Develops a position with relevant reasons and examples but may lack depth or full development
·Is adequately organized
·Expresses ideas with adequate clarity; vocabulary is acceptable but may be repetitive
·Demonstrates adequate control of writing conventions, with some errors that do not seriously impede clarity
·Acknowledges some complexity but may not explore it fully; counterargument may be superficial
·Typical length: 400–550 words

3Limited

·Demonstrates some competence in analytical writing but is clearly flawed
·Develops a position with some relevant points but is limited in reasoning or development
·Is adequately organized but may have weak or absent transitions
·Expresses ideas with some clarity but vocabulary is limited or sometimes imprecise
·Has recurring errors in grammar or mechanics that occasionally impede clarity
·Largely ignores the complexity of the issue; no counterargument or token counterargument only
·Typical length: 300–450 words

2Seriously Flawed

·Demonstrates limited analytical writing ability
·Has a position but it is poorly developed; examples are irrelevant, vague, or absent
·Has weak organization; it is difficult to follow the argument
·Vocabulary is limited and often imprecise
·Contains numerous errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that impede understanding
·Does not engage with the complexity of the issue
·Typical length: under 300 words, or longer but incoherent

1Fundamentally Deficient

·Little or no evidence of analytical writing ability
·Provides little or no analysis; the response is largely off-topic or incomprehensible
·Has no discernible organization
·Contains pervasive language errors that make the response largely incomprehensible
·Fails to address the task or task instructions

0No Score

·Off-topic (does not address the assigned issue)
·Not in English
·Merely copies the prompt
·Consists of keyboard gibberish
·Is blank

What separates a 5 from a 6: Both demonstrate clear positions, specific examples, and strong language. The 6 essay does something the 5 cannot: it makes the complexity of the issue feel genuinely understood, not just acknowledged. A 6 essay often reframes the question rather than simply answering it, and its final paragraph adds a nuance or broader implication absent from the introduction.

GRE Percentile Tables

Percentiles show what percentage of test takers scored below a given score. Note that Verbal and Quantitative percentiles differ significantly because the test-taking population performs differently on each section. The GRE test-taking pool skews toward STEM students internationally (particularly from India and China), making competitive Quant scores harder to achieve at the high end.

Verbal Reasoning Percentiles

Score	Percentile	Benchmark
170	99th	Elite — fewer than 1 in 100
168	98th	Exceptional
165	96th	Top 5%
163	93rd	Top 10%
161	88th	Very strong
160	86th	Strong
158	81st	Above average
155	69th	Competitive
152	55th	Slightly above average
150	43rd	Average
148	36th	Below average
145	20th	Weak for most programs
140	9th	Very weak
136	4th	Below most minimums
130	<1st	Lowest possible

Quantitative Reasoning Percentiles

Score	Percentile	Benchmark
170	97th	Elite — top 3%
169	96th	Exceptional
168	94th	Top 6%
167	91st	Top 10%
165	89th	Very strong for STEM
163	83rd	Strong for STEM PhDs
160	76th	Competitive floor for STEM
158	70th	Above average
155	58th	Moderate
153	49th	Average
150	35th	Below average for STEM
147	25th	Weak for STEM
143	14th	Below most STEM minimums
139	6th	Very weak
130	<1st	Lowest possible

Analytical Writing Percentiles

Score	Percentile	What It Signals
6.0	99th	Exceptional — extremely rare; publishable-quality academic writing
5.5	97th	Outstanding — top-tier analytical and language ability
5.0	93rd	Strong — competitive for humanities/social science PhD programs
4.5	80th	Above average — meets or exceeds most competitive programs
4.0	54th	Average — meets minimum floor for most programs requiring AWA
3.5	38th	Slightly below average — typically sufficient for STEM programs
3.0	15th	Below average — may raise concerns in writing-intensive programs
2.5	7th	Poor — likely to hurt applications in programs that weigh writing
2.0	3rd	Seriously weak — may require explanation in application

ScoreSelect Policy

ETS's ScoreSelect option gives you meaningful control over which test scores are sent to programs. This is one of the GRE's most practical features — it means a weak retake does not automatically hurt you.

The three ScoreSelect options

Most Recent

Sends scores from your most recent test administration only. This is the simplest option if you have taken the GRE only once or if your most recent score is your best.

Best when: your most recent test is your best performance.

All

Sends all GRE scores from the past five years — all test dates visible to the program. Some programs require this option regardless of your preference.

Required by: some programs that explicitly require all scores to be reported.

Any

Lets you hand-pick which specific test date(s) to send. The most flexible option — you can send only your best single performance, or any combination of dates you choose.

Best when: you have multiple attempts and want to send only your highest-scoring date(s).

Important limitations to understand

ScoreSelect does NOT mean programs will never know you retook the GRE. If a program requires all scores (and many do), you must comply — sending only selected scores when all are required is a violation of ETS policy and could result in score cancellation. Always check each program's stated score reporting requirements before assuming you can hide a lower score.

ScoreSelect applies at the time of sending scores, not at test time. The four free score reports designated on test day go through the "Most Recent" option by default. To use the "Any" option after test day, you send additional score reports at $35 each.

Superscoring: do programs mix-and-match across test dates?

ETS does not officially superscore the GRE. A GRE score report shows all three scores (Verbal, Quant, Writing) from a single test date — it does not mix the highest Verbal from one date with the highest Quant from another. However, many graduate programs indicate on their websites that they "consider the highest scores from any test date." If a program does this informally, retaking the GRE to improve one section (with no downside on the other) is a very efficient strategy. Check each program's policy explicitly.

Score Validity

GRE scores are valid for five years from the test date. A test taken on September 15, 2022 will be valid for applications through September 15, 2027. Scores older than five years cannot be reported to schools through ETS.

Five-year validity is longer than TOEFL (2 years), IELTS (2 years), or GMAT (5 years from the test date). This gives the GRE an advantage for students who plan far ahead — a strong score from junior year can serve applications submitted several years later.

Note: Score validity is based on the test date, not the score send date. Verify that your scores will still be within the 5-year window by the time programs receive and evaluate them, not just when you submit your application.

Sending Scores: Process and Costs

Free score reports at registration

Your registration fee includes four free score reports to programs designated before you see your unofficial score on test day. These four free designations must be made before you view your scores — once you see your Verbal and Quant numbers, the free window closes permanently. You can designate programs when you register or on test day before completing the exam.

Additional score reports after test day

Additional score reports sent after test day cost $35 per recipient. Scores are typically received by institutions within 5–7 business days. For time-sensitive applications, order additional reports well before your application deadline. Processing does not begin on weekends or holidays.

Score reporting strategy

If confident in your score: Designate your four target programs before viewing scores to get free reports. Save $140 (4 × $35) by acting before the score display.
If uncertain about your score: Wait to view your unofficial score before designating. The $140 cost of four additional reports is a small price compared to sending a weak score to your target programs.
If retaking: Check whether your target programs superscore or require all attempts. If they superscore, retaking is low-risk. If they require all scores, retaking only makes sense if you're confident in improving meaningfully.

What Graduate Programs Actually See

When you send scores to a graduate program, they receive your complete score report from the selected test date(s): Verbal Reasoning score, Quantitative Reasoning score, Analytical Writing score, and the test date. They do NOT see your responses to individual questions, your time per question, or any other process data.

Typical admitted student score ranges at leading programs

School / Program	Typical Verbal	Typical Quant	Writing
MIT — Computer Science PhD	155–165	165–170	4.0+
Stanford — Engineering PhD	155–167	165–170	4.0+
Harvard — Psychology PhD	158–168	150–162	4.5+
Harvard Business School (MBA)	155–165	158–168	4.0+
Yale — English / Humanities PhD	163–170	148–158	5.0+
Columbia — CS / Data Science MS	157–165	163–170	3.5+
University of Chicago — Economics PhD	160–167	163–170	4.5+
Princeton — Engineering PhD	155–163	164–170	4.0+
Carnegie Mellon — CS / ML	155–163	165–170	4.0+
UC Berkeley — CS / EECS PhD	155–165	163–170	3.5+
Caltech — Physics / Engineering	155–165	167–170	4.0+
Northwestern — MBA (Kellogg)	158–165	158–165	4.0+
Wharton (UPenn) — MBA	160–167	160–167	4.5+
Duke — Engineering PhD	153–163	160–168	3.5+
Johns Hopkins — Biomedical Engineering	152–162	160–168	3.5+
UCLA — Psychology PhD	155–163	150–160	4.0+
NYU Stern — MBA	155–163	155–163	3.5+

Always verify: Requirements change, and many departments have recently made GRE optional or eliminated it entirely. Verify current requirements on each program's official admissions website. GRE scores are one factor in holistic admissions — strong research experience, recommendations, and a compelling statement of purpose can compensate for a score below these ranges.

Find out where your score stands — take a practice exam

Take a full-length GRE practice exam and receive instant scores for all three sections. Free, no account required. AI scoring for Writing.

Take a Free Practice Exam →

Ready to reach your target score?

Take a Free Practice Exam →Read the Complete Guide →

No sign-up required · Full exam · Instant scores